 | Implicit theories — entity (fixed) vs incremental (growth) — predict neural and behavioral response to failure. Core beliefs about traits shape whether difficulty is threat or training. Carol S. Dweck First published 1999 - Reprint (2000) · Psychology Press · ISBN 9781841690247 |
|---|
Key principles
- Implicit theories — People hold entity (fixed) or incremental (growth) beliefs about traits — often unconscious, always consequential.
- Failure response — Entity theorists treat setback as verdict; incremental theorists treat it as information — behavior diverges under the same event.
- Neural signature — Brain activity after error differs by theory — mindset is not only self-talk but measurable processing.
- Praise shape — Praising ability reinforces entity theory; praising process and strategy reinforces incremental theory — feedback is intervention.
- Challenge uptake — Incremental frameworks increase willingness to attempt hard tasks — difficulty reads as training, not exposure of fixed limits.
- Beyond pop mindset — This volume is the empirical monograph behind the slogan — read it when you need mechanism, not poster quotes.
Core science
The foundational academic text behind implicit theories of intelligence — empirical studies separating entity (fixed) and incremental (growth) mindsets.
Application
Goes deeper than popular summaries: how core beliefs about biological traits dictate neural response to failure and willingness to take on cognitive challenge. Open Behavioral change canon on the Atlas shelf for the mechanism map. Curated domain trail: Deliberate Practice.